Added: Jammie Hollman - Date: 01.07.2021 18:43 - Views: 45177 - Clicks: 8319
The American Academy of Pediatricians recently released a statement saying that the health benefits of circumcision outweighed the risks. The statement reversed a one made in that said there were good medical reasons for it; but a few years earlier, inthe Academy had officially concluded that it was not a medical necessity. Clearly, circumcision is one of those surgeries about which opinion shifts back and forth over the years. Medical concerns have changed frequently. In the s many worried about phimosis, a condition in which the foreskin does not retract completely.
To read some of the medical journal articles from the period, one might think this problem was nearly epidemic. Circumcision foreskin forum one of the cures widely touted by physicians for this particular disorder. They also recommended circumcision as a remedy for masturbation and nervous conditions later in the century; in fact, some even endorsed the surgery for women suffering the same maladies.
Even if we agree that circumcision has some public health benefits, it is not the cure-all that we might imagine. This research found that it reduced transmission from infected women to men but had no effect on transmission between men.
In addition, it ameliorated the spread of some sexually transmitted infections HPV and herpes but not gonorrhea, syphilis, or the most common STI, chlamydia. Is altering perfectly healthy bodies prophylactically really the best response, or might education campaigns about safe sex practices be more successful and less invasive for foreskin forum prevention of all these diseases? Babies cannot consent, obviously, and so intactivists deplore second party assent to unnecessary surgery.
Though offering ethical arguments and critiques of procircumcision claims, those who question routine circumcision are too easily dismissed. Pediatricians, like most other Americans, are accustomed to thinking of circumcision as natural, harmless, and beneficial. Paradigms are difficult to shift. But if we took a moment to put aside what we think we know, and to look carefully at the conflicting medical debates circumcision has inspired over the years, we might be persuaded to at least question the necessity and wisdom of the procedure, given its risks, its permanence, and the fact that its recipient might have chosen otherwise.
For some religious and cultural communities, of course, non-health reasons motivate circumcision. Jews and Muslims circumcise boys to fulfill religious covenants, and these rituals have recently come under scrutiny in Germany. Many there and in our own country as well are worried about pitting state power against religious freedom. But most Foreskin forum families do not have these same concerns. Many parents are likely to simply ask their physicians what to do.
By affirming that medical benefits outweigh the risks, the AAP makes the health card difficult to trump. For those parents who rest their case on the most recent health claims, it would be worth keeping in mind that medical opinions have consistently flip-flopped over circumcision. This year she is a visiting scholar in the History of Science Department at Harvard University. The opinions expressed here are those of the authors, not The Hastings Center.
Search The Hastings Center. Events Upcoming Events Events. Receive Our Newsletter. Other Ways To Give. Bioethics Forum Essay In the more than 35 years since federal legislation created organ procurement organizations OPOs to recover organs from deceased donors for transplantation, there has been a disparity in their performance, with the best OPOs recovering organs from four times as many donors as the worst OPOs by obj Share: Facebook Twitter. Bioethics Forum Essay Quality of Life? Bioethics Forum Essay The pandemic magnified the inherent difficulty and stress of conversations involving life-sustaining treatment by forcing clinicians and patients to engage in life-altering discussions via telephone and video conference, restricting nonverbal communication and eye contact, and eliminating the benefit of simply foreskin forum another person nearby in time of crisis.
Bioethics Forum Essay In recent years, court cases and scholarly articles have increasingly highlighted discrepancies foreskin forum the legal definition of death in the United States and the medical diagnostic standards for determining brain death. It has become clear to many that the year-old Uniform Determination of Death Act, the legal standard, should be updated.
Bioethics Forum Essay Several years ago, one of us decided to donate a kidney to someone who needed one. Read the Post. It is likely that many people who are candidates for the drug will no longer be competent to make their own health care decisions, and will be relying heavily on others to make the decision with them or for them.
Bioethics Forum Essay June 7,was a bad day for science. International Perspectives Read the Post. Bioethics Forum Essay In late May, an international organization eliminated a year prohibition against human embryo research beyond 14 days. The legal and scientific consequences will vary around the world. It is on full display during the coronavirus pandemic, contributing to cases and deaths. The waivers, which need support from other countries, would likely save lives in low- and middle-income countries. Bioethics Forum Essay Changes in abortion law threaten to undermine a major benefit of prenatal diagnosis, namely the ability of pregnant women to choose whether or not to continue their pregnancies upon learning of a serious fetal foreskin forum.
The Costa Rican president suggested that every person who can travel to the U. Vaccine tourism, then, seems to be another promising business opportunity for the powerful countries that have accumulated vaccines instead of redistributing them soon and fairly. Bioethics Forum Essay Many Latin American countries are being devastated by excessive loss of life from Covid, many sectors of society falling below the poverty line, and health systems being overwhelmed.
As collateral damage, some countries in the region are witnessing an eruption of populism and autocratic trends and an increasing erosion of already weak and unstable democracies. Can bioethics be a useful tool for managing this crisis? Argentina provides a case study. Close this module. The Hastings Center has never shied away from the toughest ethical challenges faced by society. Your yourname example.Foreskin forum
email: [email protected] - phone:(398) 734-7894 x 4931